<
back to Services & Technology list 
Fare
Payment Technologies>
Printer-friendly
version
Electronic and automated fare payment systems integrate electronic
communication, data processing, data storage, and microcomputer
technologies in the process of fare collection in subsequent record
keeping and funds transfer. The technologies developed intend to
reduce the travelers' inconvenience, vehicle delays, and revenue
leakage associated with paying cash fares on transit vehicles. In
the past decade, transit operators across the nation and worldwide
have adopted many of these advanced technologies into their fare
payment system to increase convenience and efficiency.
Electronic Fare Payment Systems include two main
components: the first component is called Advanced Fare Payment
Systems and deals with specific fare media and new hardware devices.
This includes a variety of fare card types such as stored value
fare payment cards and hardware such as Ticket Reading and Imprinting
Machines (TRIM) for handling transfers. The second component is
called Fare
Integration Systems and deals with the creation of multi-modal
and multi-provider transportation networks that link together the
fare collection of different operators and modes of transit. Such
advances, made possible by the development of new media and hardware
devices, allow fare media to be used for more than one transit mode,
such as magnetic strip cards usable for subways, buses, and passenger
ferries. Another type of Fare Integration System is one that links
fare collection to consumer financial systems. This allows the use
of credit, debit and ATM cards for transit fare payment. The two
components, Fare Payment Technologies and Fare Integration Systems,
provide travel that is seamless for the rider but operationally
and financially sound for the multiple operators.
Traditionally, fare collection involved placing money or tokens
into the farebox upon boarding the transit vehicle. While simple
in nature, this method was time consuming, inconvenient to the user
and required labor-intensive, theft-prone money handling activities.
The advent of electronic and automated fare payment systems has
reduced these high cost transactions by utilizing electronic communication,
data processing and data storage techniques in fare collection.
These fare payment technologies are rapidly replacing the manual
methods.
An advanced fare payment system involves an electronic fare media
capable of storing fare information in a variety of forms from read-only
to read-write forms. These electronic fare media include everything
from magnetic strip cards to smart cards that contain microprocessors,
each with their own respective advantages.
In 1983, cards containing an Integrated Circuit (IC) first appeared
in France for use on pay phones. These cards, sold at fixed denominations,
contain read-write memory that is hard-wired so the value can be
decreased but not increased to prevent the risk of counterfeit.
The stored value decreases with use until the card is exhausted
and then discarded. These cards also contain Read Only Memory (ROM)
that allows for non-alterable bits of information that can be used
for identification purpose such as ID cards. IC cards are used only
for simple applications because they can run on hardwired logic
routines and do not require a microcomputer chip.
Contact-type Integrated Circuit (IC) smart cards are more sophisticated
than the original French IC cards and carry a microcomputer and
two types of memory: electronically erasable programmable memory
(EEPROM) and ROM. This innovation allows for more storage of information
and some simple processing. The EEPROM, a read-write memory, can
be used for information that changes with use such as monetary value
and use history. The ROM in the contact-type IC smart card can be
used for identification purposes as in the regular IC cards, but
is also used to store the microcomputer's operating program. The
augmentation of the microcomputer gives the contact-type IC card
more sophisticated capabilities such as the ability to process computational
routines. Such advances enable greater security and privacy for
stored information by creating methods of positive user identification
to secure transactions and encryption to protect data. This innovation
is particularly important for the use of contact-type IC smart cards
as a transit fare card because of its ability to carry cash content
securely. The contact-type IC smart cards, used for transit fare
payment have many of the advantages of an electronic and automated
fare payment system. These include the ability to accommodate more
sophisticated fare pricing systems, elimination of cash and coin
handling, and automation of accounting processes. The advantage
that sets this new technology apart from the rest is the microcomputer
that allows for greater security and privacy.
Contact-type IC smart cards are considered "contact-type"
because they require contact between the array of metal contacts
on one side of the card and the read-write head. Electrical signals
between the card and the read-write unit communicates and transfers
the appropriate information. Like the magnetic strip card, the contact-type
IC smart card requires the insertion into a read-write unit and
is limited by processing time when rapid, instantaneous processing
is desired. Generally, contact-type IC smart cards contain no battery
and can only use nonvolatile memory such as EEPROM, which has drawbacks
in speed and cost. A recent development of a type of EEPROM called
flash memory has greatly increased performance and lowered price
for IC smart cards. Despite the growing interest in other types
of IC cards, IC cards with microcomputers and metal contacts still
represent the largest portion of the market.
The magnetic strip card first appeared in the banking industry
in the late 1970's and is widely used in banking, retail, telephone
systems, access control, airline ticketing and transit fare collection.
Magnetic strips can be printed on cards ranging from heavy paper
to a variety of plastics and they can be coated with a plastic layer
for extended life. These cards have been particularly successful
in rapid transit systems in the form of readable and writeable cards
that require read-write units. These read-write units are installed
in computerized ticket vending machines and turnstiles at each rapid
transit station. The ticket vending machines accept coins and bills
in exchange for magnetic strip tickets reflecting the appropriate
value. Inserting the ticket into turnstiles at the beginning and
end of a trip allows the read-write unit to deduct the fare according
to the length of the trip.
The San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) is an example of
a successful implementation of this technology. BART first adopted
the magnetic strip card some twenty years ago in the form of an
inexpensive paper magnetic strip ticket. Although the magnetic strip
card technology has long been in use by rapid transit systems, it
has not been as readily adopted in the bus transit system and is
only now beginning to replace the conventional paper transfers used
by buses.
One of the benefits of using the magnetic strip card is increased
convenience due to its capability to store value for more than one
trip. Generally, the card allows the rider to retain the equivalent
of a week's worth of fares on the card, decreasing the number of
separate cash transactions or tokens the rider must carry. The reduction
of cash and coin handling can improve security and lower costs as
well as save the passengers time. Another benefit of the magnetic
strip card stems from its ability to store information about the
origin and destination of a trip. This allows flexibility in creating
a fare pricing system that is more precise by determining the fare
based on distance or time of day. Magnetic strip cards are also
advantageous because the automation of accounting processes increases
efficiency and accuracy to lower operations costs.
Despite the many advantages of the magnetic strip card, there are
also drawbacks to consider. While the storage capability of the
magnetic strip card decreases the passenger's time spent in cash
transactions, the rate at which passengers pass through the turnstiles
is marginally slower than with traditional token methods. The magnetic
strip card requires specific placement of the card for proper contact
with the reader head so that insertion of the card into a read-write
unit is a requirement. Thus, the aggregate time required inserting
and retrieving the care results in a slower process through the
turnstile. Other drawbacks include the risk of counterfeit that
can be countered by using read-only cards or by increasing the coercivity.
Finally, like the traditional fare boxes, the read-write units are
also subject to their share of failure and require a fair amount
of maintenance.
Unlike magnetic cards and IC smart cards, proximity cards do not
require direct physical contact between the card and a read-write
unit. The most common proximity card today is the radio frequency
(RF) proximity card. This type of card contains an induction coil
that is coupled with the RF magnetic field generated by another
induction coil, located in the read-write unit. The RF magnetic
field of the unit serves as the power source for the circuits in
the card and when modulated, carries signals to the card. The card
must also contain some small power conditioning circuitry in order
to attain power from the RF magnetic filed and to regulate it into
a useable form. Another option is to include a battery in place
of a power conditioning system. The card itself also has the capability
of sending signals back to the read-write unit using the same coil
or a separate coil or antenna.
Proximity cards only require that the card and the read-write unit
be in close proximity thereby eliminating the need for insertion
into a unit for precise positioning of the card. This significantly
reduces the time consuming processes of the contact-type method.
The functional distance between the card and the read-write unit
is dictated by the strength of the RF induction field generated
by the read-write unit, but in practice is often held from an inch
to one foot from the unit. The elimination of insertion into a read-write
unit greatly increases the speed at which passengers can go through
turnstiles or board buses and can potentially be an effective method
of a transit fare payment system. The lack of physical contact between
the card and the reader also serves to lengthen the life of the
card by reducing wear and tare.
Proximity smart cards, those that integrate the RF proximity card
with the operational capabilities of contact-type IC smart cards
are currently being tested for practical use in the U.S. Again,
proximity smart cards, like other automated and electronic fare
payment systems, would accommodate more sophisticated fare pricing
systems, eliminate cash and coin handling and automate accounting
processes. Other benefits of proximity smart cards include potential
inter-modal and inter-operator transfers with advanced security
features.
RF Proximity cards are currently being used for other ends, and
in particular, for identification purposes. This is a relatively
simple form of the RF proximity card, where the card need only contain
a single identification message that it relays in response to a
query given by the reading unit. Such uses of proximity cards require
only a ROM memory that can be programmed during manufacturing. Other
current uses for RF proximity cards include keyless entry systems,
personnel identification and inventory security in offices and retail
stores.
Capacitively coupled cards are cards that use capacitive coupling
in order to perform read-write functions. This type of card contains
two or more areas of metal foil, that are covered by extremely thin
layers of a plastic insulator. When the plastic coated metal foil
layers are closely aligned with the plastic coated metal foils contained
within the read-write unit, a capacitor is created that couples
the circuits of the two components. This coupling allows the communication
and transfer of information between the card and the read-write
unit by supplying the required power and signals. The capacitively
coupled card is similar to the RF proximity card in that it does
not require direct physical contact between the circuits of the
card and the circuits of the read-write unit. This card is different
from the RF proximity card because it still requires insertion into
a read-write unit for precise positioning and does not come along
with the benefits of contactless methods. The capacitively coupled
card has not yet been used for practical application in the transit
systems.
Fare integration systems are fare payment systems that are intended
to simplify travel and make it more efficient among different transit
modes and operators. There are three types of integration that are
currently emphasized in the Fare Integration System. One type involves
linking the fare payment systems among different modes of transportation
that are managed by a single transit operator. A second type links
together different transit operators to the same system of fare
payment. A third type of integration links transit fare payment
systems with consumer financial systems such as banks and credit
unions. The goal of these mergers is to increase convenience for
the passenger and operational effectiveness for the operators.
A "common currency" and standards for its use is necessary
to integrate different modes, operators and systems. The ability
to set key features of integration systems, such as standards can
foster large-scale acceptance and future development of new related
technology. Fare Integration Systems require that the participants
designate a common type of fare media, such as magnetic strip cards
or smart cards. The adoption standards for a common fare media and
their data transmission devices will serve to simplify integration
and to encourage other participants to integrate with the established
system in the future.
Most credit cards and ATM cards are designed to comply with the
International Standards Organization (ISO) standards for plastic
magnetic strip cards that have been established for many years.
These magnetic strip cards, the ISO standards allow the use of credit
cards and ATM cards in far to reach places. Contact-type read write
memory cards like the European telephone industry for phone cards
use established ISO standards. However, these standards are not
as strictly adhered to as in the case of magnetic strip cards, but
they are generally accepted. Standards for proximity and capacitively
coupled cards are under development and deal with carrier frequencies,
baud rate, data transfer protocols and encryption.
An Integrated Fare Payment System following universal standards
allows efficient linking of multiple providers. There are many benefits
that make this cooperative fare payment system appealing. The most
significant benefits include the accommodation of more sophisticated
fare structures without manual computation, significant decrease
in cash transfers, automation of accounting processes, convenience
and operational effectiveness. These advances, which mostly require
electronic fare media, are realized through technological advances
in electronic data processing, communication and storage. Among
these advances are new innovations that are strictly designed to
accommodate Fare Integration Systems.
Transit passes, often read-only magnetic strip cards, do not contain
value that is reduced with use, but serve as a pass when inserted
into a reader unit. Current uses include fare payment on subway
and bus transit. Transit passes are purchased during issuing periods
and are commonly valid for one month. There is some variation in
the length between issuing periods. These cards are swiped through
reading units at subway turnstiles or electronic fare boxes of buses.
The primary benefit of using transit passes is increased convenience
and accounting simplifications by minimizing the number of monetary
transactions. Monetary transactions can be maximally reduced when
the transit pass system is integrated with the financial systems
of employers. With the implementation of this integration system,
transit passes can be paid for by the employer or via the employer
through deduction from wages. This would allow employers to purchase
transit passes for all employees in one transaction, and the passenger
would be free of all such transactions. More simple forms of transit
passes in use today are simple cards with a picture identification
that is shown to a bus driver or subway attendant for admittance.
Stored value fare cards contain value for more than one trip and
value is deducted from the card with use. Fare media that is appropriate
for such use include read-write magnetic strip cards, contact type
smart cards and proximity smart cards and all require respective
read-write units. Stored value fare cards can serve to decrease
the number of monetary transactions by allowing accumulation of
value on the card. This option also avoids transaction fees associated
with credit card use. These cards record the origin and destination
of a trip so that fare-pricing systems can be developed according
to time of day and distance traveled. Stored value fare cards can
also be applied to multi-operator transit networks because of their
ability to record origins and destinations, which allows revenues
to be properly distributed among multiple transit operators.
One way to integrate the fare payment system with consumer financial
systems is to set up passenger accounts that would be billed according
to individual transit use. Identification cards would be issued
and transit use would be monitored and recorded by read-only units
that would recognize accounts. Appropriate fare media for this system
would only require read-only capabilities and can be fulfilled by
bar code cards, magnetic strip cards and RF proximity cards. If
origins and destinations are recorded along with fare information,
sophisticated fare pricing systems could also be utilized. Currently
there are no practical applications of this system.
The multi-use electronic coin purse is a system to integrate transit
fare payment with local merchants. These cards, like the stored
value fare card, contain value for more than one transit trip but
also allow for small purchases from participating merchants. Fare
media appropriate for such use requires read-write capabilities
and include read-write magnetic strip card or IC smart cards. Current
developments in multi-use electronic coin purses involve IC smart
cards.
New York City Transit (NYCT) has recently adopted this option for
their stored-value MetroCard system that accommodates both bus and
subway. The fare media used is a long-life thin plastic read-write
card that, on buses, is used in conjunction with swipe-type read-write
units. The swipe-type is faster and more durable than the ticket
reading type units that require insertion. The MetroCard is sold
at fixed denominations but are rechargeable. All NYCT rapid transit
stations and buses are expected to accept the card in the near future.
There are also plans to extend the use of the MetroCard to other
transit systems, small purchases and pay phones.
The Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority (MARTA) has also
introduced two types of stored value card in the form of contact-type
IC cards. One form is sold at fixed denominations where value cannot
be increased, while the other has recharging capacity. The cards
can also be used at local merchants and service providers that accept
VISA cards. With general use, MARTA expects to reduce cash-handling
costs by 80 percent.
Multi-use electronic coin purses are presently being developed
by the Delaware Authority for Regional Transportation (DART) in
their DART smart card system. In this program, DART will integrate
its fare collection system with the Wilmington Trust Bank and participating
retail merchants and service providers. Passengers will be issued
ATM cards in the form of contact-type stored value smart cards which
can be used on the 135 DART buses as well as for small purchases
with participating merchants. These cards will also be available
for passengers who are not customers at the Wilmington Trust Bank.
Read-write units will be installed on the 135 DART buses and value-adding
machines will be widely available to increase value of the card
using cash.
Integration of transit fare payment with financial systems can
also introduce fare media vending machines that accept debit/credit
cards for payment. This would reduce costs and losses associated
with cash transactions and increase convenience. Transit operators
that have already introduced or are planning to introduce cashless
purchase include Chicago transit Authority, BART, Massachusetts
Bay Transportation Authority, Portland's Tri-Met and the Ann Arbor
Transit Authority. Some systems also accept ATM cards as well as
debit/credit cards for payment. The use of ATM cards, as opposed
to credit cards, is an attractive option because there is no charge
to the transit operator for its use as payment.
A related system is one that was adopted by Phoenix Transit buses
in May of 1995. This system combined the use of credit cards and
passenger accounts for bus fare payment. Bus transit fares were
recorded and accumulated in accounts that are billed monthly to
the credit card companies. The reason for keeping passenger accounts
instead of directly billing per use was to reduce the fees owed
to credit card companies. Phoenix Transit itself did not issue cards
or bill passengers and instead paid fees to credit card companies,
as do all merchants who accept credit cards. Passengers swiped their
bank-issued cards through standard magnetic strip readers upon boarding
transit buses and fare was accumulated in passenger accounts. Since
credit card companies were billed monthly per passenger, which reduced
fees to that of one transaction per passenger per month. As of August
1, 2002, MasterCard and VISA cards were no longer accepted for fare
payment on the bus. Only cash, tokens, tickets, or passes are currenlty
accepted.
Go to the ITS Decision Report on
Fare Payment Technologies
Go
to the ITS Decision Report on
Fare Payment Technologies
Authors: Lingo Leung,
Phyllis Orrick, and Lauren Smith.
Last update:
September 7, 2005
|