<
back to Services & Technology list 
Safety
>Printer-friendly
version
What are Highway-Rail Intersection Technologies?
-
Inductive loop detectors, digital data communications, railway
transponders, train location systems, radio, and wireless transmitters
are ITS technologies used at Highway-Rail Intersections (HRI)
to enforce safety, efficiency, productivity, control, and communication.
See our Telecommunications Diagram on HRI
for more information.
Key Results
-
Accidents at Highway-Rail Intersections are a continuing problem
in the United States.
-
Many new ITS technologies are replacing more archaic warning
signals at Highway-Rail Intersections throughout the US.
-
The implementation of ITS technologies such as Automated Enforcement
at Lowered Crossings reduces risky roadway driver behavior while
other technologies, like the Vehicle Proximity Alert System,
need further testing to demonstrate usability.
- ITS technologies are continually combined and integrated in
many ways, making testing and implementation an extensive and
on-going process.
Benefits
- Safety: Accident, injury, fatality reduction and prevention;
Increased roadway driver awareness.
- Efficiency: Exchange of real-time data between train
and traffic controllers at HRI; Reduced risk for manufacturers
and implementers; People and goods effectively moved per unit
time.
- Productivity: Cost reduction in transportation of goods
and people.
- Control: More interoperable and coordinated transportation
systems; ITS tracks and monitors train activity.
- Communication: Real-time communication between train
operators, traffic control centers, and roadway vehicles.
Costs
-
The cost of ITS technologies applied to HRI depends on a number
of factors, including the equipment used, location and duration
of testing, and personnel involved.
Implementation and Operational Challenges
-
There is no coordinated and interoperable nationwide system
for ITS technologies at HRI.
-
Human factors are largely responsible for accidents, injuries
and fatalities at HRI. Such factors, including roadway driver
confusion and train operator errors, are difficult to predict
and control.
Where is it Implemented?
- Automated Enforcement of Lowered Crossing Gates: Los Angeles,
CA
- Vehicle Proximity Alert System (VPAS): Pueblo, Colorado
- Positive Train Separation: Blaine, Washington to Pasco, Washington
- Advanced Warning for Railroad Delays (AWARD): San Antonio,
TX
- Second Train Coming (STC): Maryland and Los Angeles, CA
- Vehicle Alert System: Minnesota and Gary-Chicago-Milwaukee
Corridor
- Four Quadrant Gate System with Obstacle Detection and Train
Control: Groton, Connecticut
- Non-Intrusive Train Detection: Moorhead, Minnesota
- Intelligent Grade Crossing integrated with other ITS technologies:
New York
Author: Lauren Smith
Last
Update: 11/1/01
|