<
back to Services & Technology list 
Printer-friendly
version
Traffic
Surveillance > Road-based
Technologies > Roadside
>
What Is It?
- Video image detection systems (VIDS) employ
machine vision technology to automatically analyze traffic data
collected with Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) systems.
- VIDS can be used to monitor freeway conditions,
arterials and intersections, detect incidents and classify vehicles.
- A distinction should be made between VIDS that can actuate
signals and detect incidents, queue lengths and other parameters
with little or no human intervention and video surveillance that
is mostly used for "manual" inspection of existing traffic conditions
and verification of incidents. Most existing video feeds are used
in a manual fashion. However, VIDS are rapidly and successfully
being deployed to perform a variety of functions. See our Telecommunications
Diagram of CCTV
for more information.
Key Results
Most video networks used by the ITS community,
and other industries, are analog networks typically based on Frequency
Division Multiplexing (FDM) transmission techniques. Analog video
systems are a mature, proven technology that yields high quality
video at relatively low cost. The main advantage of VIDS lies in
its wide area detection capabilities, usually several lanes for
one camera. This allows the efficient detection of shock waves and
other spatial traffic parameters, such as density, queue lengths,
and speed profiles, that cannot be easily obtained by conventional
devices. In addition, VIDS can be used in a number of different
ways outlined below. Benefits
- Rapid incident detection.
- Identification of the incident type, the level
of gravity and what type of intervention is needed if any. This
is mostly done by human operators.
- Vehicle classification, intersection monitoring,
signal actuation and license plate reading (which can be used
for enforcement and travel time estimation).
- Collection and potential analysis of traffic
and incident data. Information provided in the video sequences
immediately preceding an incident can be particularly valuable
for understanding where and how incidents occur so as to enhance
infrastructure reliability. Surveillance data could be used not
only for safety but also for transportation planning, operations
and research.
- Enhanced installation safety: because installation
typically does not require lane closures, traffic personnel safety
is enhanced and traffic disruptions are minimized.
- Integration with other existing surveillance
technologies as well as with other management strategies such
as variable message signs and adaptive ramp metering control.
- Traveler information in the form of video feeds
accessible on numerous web sites allows travelers to make better-informed
travel decisions and to avoid non-recurrent congestion as well
as inclement weather.
Costs
- Initial capital outlays may exceed the
costs of traditional detection methods such as loop detectors
but VIDS have lower installation and life-time (operations and
maintenance) costs than traditional detection methods. Capital
outlays include communications costs, which can be significant
for digital video technology. Digital video technology is close
to three times more expensive than traditional analog technology.
- With an existing transmission link, a
color CCTV camera with a 20-year lifetime can vary in cost between
$10,000 and $50,000 with annual operations and maintenance costs
of between $200 and $1,000. A CCTV camera tower with a 20-year
lifetime, can vary in cost between $18,000 and $50,000 with maximum
annual operations and maintenance costs of $900. This does not
include the software systems and algorithms required for automatic
surveillance .
New Developments
- In the last few years complex automatic
incident detection (AID) and queue estimation systems have been
implemented either as tests or as actual deployments. These systems
automatically detect incidents, estimate queues and change variable
message signs to warn travelers of problems.
- Given its high quality-to-price ratio,
analog video transmission technology will continue to be deployed
for some years. However, despite the efficiency of analog systems,
digital video systems are gaining in importance and are widely
believed to become the dominant technology for video transmission
in ITS over the next 10 to 15 years. Eventually, digital networks
and systems will supersede analog systems everywhere, so it seems
to make sense to invest in digital video equipment. However, the
transition to digital video transmission equipment will only happen
gradually because of costs and the need for an industry-wide video
compression standard (MPEG-2 seems to be the emerging standard).
Implementation Challenges
- There are no technological barriers given
the technical maturity of video systems. The main technical challenge
lies in refining automatic incident detection algorithms and software
systems.
- Regarding digital video, the chief barriers
to implementation are institutional (in particular the proper
planning of communications infrastructure) and monetary (the high
cost of setting up digital networks).
Where is it implemented?
- There are over 5,000 VIDS in existence today
throughout the world.
- Simple VIDS, for signal actuation, speed estimation
or traffic counts, are implemented throughout Europe, the United
States and Australia. These are present on a more limited basis
in Asia (principally in China and Japan).
- More complex VIDS that automatically detect
incidents, estimate queue lengths and actuate variable message
signs are less widespread. Examples include:
- The Migrazur system on the Escota Network
of 430km of freeways in the southern Provence-Alpes-Cote d'Azur
regions of France.
- DIVA system in the Les Halles tunnel in
central Paris.
- The A4-A31/Brescia-Padova freeway in Northern
Italy.
- The City Link project in Sydney, one of
the biggest and most sophisticated projects covering 22km
of high-quality roads.
Author: Dimitri Loukakos
|