|
Lane control signals (LCS) have been or are currently being installed
on freeways in several major metropolitan areas in the United States.
Consisting simply of overhead lane specific signals denoting a red "X"
if travel in the lane is prohibited, and a green arrow if travel is permitted,
these signals symbolically display the current status of each freeway
lane to inform motorists of the condition of the lanes downstream so that
they may take appropriate action. See our Telecommunications Diagram on
Lane
Control for more information. LCS have been in existence for over
30 years, and are more common outside the United States. Historically,
the most prevalent use of LCS has been for the operation of reversible
lanes. Some of the benefits associated with LCS implementation include:
- reduction in the number and severity of primary and secondary accidents;
- improved traffic flow stability (less variation in vehicle speeds)
headway optimization, and increased vehicle throughput;
- reduced travel time, energy consumption, and pollutant emission;
- reduced queue lengths;
- improved safety and efficiency for roadway maintenance operations;
- improved emergency vehicle movement.
Where is it Implemented?
Brisbane, Australia
One of the most sophisticated Lane Control Systems (LCS) implemented to
date exists on Coronation Drive in Brisbane, Australia. Coronation Drive
is a major inner city arterial and passes through a large business and
residential area. There are many buses running along this Drive that have
to run in the curb lane at all times. As a result, a lane control system
was needed--beyond an HOV lane--that would allow buses to travel quickly
on the appropriate side of the road during different times of day. The
currenlty installed Coronation Drive Tidal Flow system advises motorists
entering the road of which lanes they may drive in at various times of
day. This system works through the integration of a number of technologies:
- LED displays over each lane indicate which lanes are open or closed
- Changeable Message Signs (CMS) that display a straight-ahead arrow,
left turn arrow, or right turn arrow indicate to motorists that
the lanes bearing such signs are open. CMS that display a red cross
indicate that a lane is closed.
- Electronically-controlled barriers prevent drivers from entering a
closed lane. A controller can remotely open or close as well as monitor
the status of the barriers. A beacon is positioned on a barrier post
and flashes when the barriers are opening or closing.
- Pavement lights embedded in the roadway direct traffic away from the
bus lanes during peak hours.
- Loop detectors sense the persistant presence of a vehicle traveling
in the opposite direction in a particular lane; this results in the
closure of the lane and the opening of the lane for traffic in the new
direction.
- Lane control computers control each device in this system. These computers
monitor and activate the lane control devices during transition periods
(i.e. when traffic must be directed towards lanes outside the main arterial)
Other Field Test Results of LCS Systems
| Area |
Benefits |
Source |
| Minneapolis, MN (I-94 system) |
Lane volumes upstream of congestion
reduced 7 to 11 percent. |
Carlson, G., A. Lari. Evaluation
of the use of downward Yellow Arrows in the I-94 Lane Control Signal
System. Minnesota Department of Transportation. August 1982. |
| Austin, TX |
7 to 12 percent reduction in
the lane volumes at various points upstream of an incident. |
Burford, W. A Study of the Effectiveness
of a Changeable Message Sign System. Teas Section, ASCE Department
of Civil Engineering. University of Texas at Austin, January 1983. |
| Detroit, MI (Lodge Freeway) |
Minimal effect on freeway throughput
and lane changing activity, but did encourage drivers to exit the
closed lanes. |
Dudek, C. Freeway Traffic Surveillance
and Control Research Project: Study 424 - Effect of Incidents on
Freeway Traffic. Michigan State HIghway Department |
| Netherlands-(Dutch Motorway Control and Signaling
System) |
16 percent total accident reduction;
36 percent reduction in secondary accidents;
19 percent reduction in the number of vehicles
involved in accidents.
42 percent reduction in roadway work in the
day;
25 percent reduction at night |
Klijnhout, I. Motorway Control and
Signalling: The Test of Time". Traffic Engineering and Control.
Volume 25, No. 4, April 1984. |
| Glasgow- (CITRAC-Centrally Integrated Traffic
Control) |
20 percent reduction in off-peak
accidents during its first five years in operation |
Mowatt, A. CITRAC-The First Five
Years. Traffic Engineering and Control. Volume 25 #5.1984. |
Authors: Lauren Smith, Justin Black, and Joe
Wanat. Last update: 7/16/02
|